GetVoIP's Top UC Experts - Me and 49 Others!

GetVoIP.com is a pretty handy resource for decision-makers looking for solutions in our space. They serve as an independent information clearinghouse of sorts, where buyers can find the right offerings and determine the best ways to compare what's out there. They rely on analysts like me for industry-based perspectives on core communications needs that all businesses need to stay current with - UC, hosted VoIP, SIP trunking, contact centers, etc.

I've written for them occasionally, and one way they support the buyers is to profile the top thought leaders. Everyone has an opinion on the Web - but in most cases, nobody is asking for it (which doesn't seem to deter most people) - with the result being an impossible ocean of viewpoints that decision makers could draw upon for guidance. To make that a bit more manageable, GetVoIP puts out their top lists from time to time, with the most recent being for UC.

In case you haven't come across this yet on social media, I'm blogging about it here. I'm happy to report that I'm in their "Top 50" list, and if you had the time to peruse the whole group, you'll probably end up making some really good decisions. And if you play your cards right, it won't cost you a penny.

Of course, analysts like me are always available for hire if you need more strategic expertise, and I'm just an email or phone call away from taking your business to the next level. For now, though, my one piece of free advice is to check out the list, and keep regular tabs on GetVoIP.

State of the Mid-Market with UC

The stars haven't lined up for me lately to get on a UCStrategies podcast, but they did last week, where the topic was the mid-market opportunity for UC. We certainly spend a lot of time on both sides of that space, with smaller scale SMBs being price-driven, and larger scale enterprises dealing with complex network environments.

The mid-market is really neither of these, and once you understand their needs, there's a distinct opportunity for UC vendors and channels. Avaya has been focusing there lately, Lync has a strong play, and vendors like Mitel, ShoreTel and NEC are right at home serving these customers.

We covered the ground during out podcast session, which was led by Phil Edholm. All told, 10 of us weighed in with our views, and my comments start at the 24:29 mark. The replay has now been posted to the UCS portal, including start times for each speaker if you just want to catch what specific UC Experts had to say.

My Next Webinar - Why the Time is Now for Hosted VoIP - April 21

Another shout-out here for my next Ziff Davis B2B webinar. They've been keeping me busy lately, and this time around, I'll be addressing the hosted VoIP opportunity for SMBs. Their webinars are always well-attended, and am expecting more of the same next Tuesday.

Start time is 2pm EST, and for more info, here's the registration page. Hope you can join us.

Mitel's Crystal Ball - Business Communications in 2025

Well, sort of. Everyone needs to put thought leadership out there to enhance their brand, and few things grab attention more than looking into the future. It's always fun to speculate, but at the rate things keep changing, I'd be happy predicting accurately six months out.

Anyhow, this is one of the ways analysts stay busy, and Mitel recently polled a bunch of us for our thoughts. As you know, Mitel recently went through some serious re-branding, and it's still early to say where/how it's paying off. Well, they've pulled all this together, and the results have just been published in an e-book format.

I'm in there, along with several others you likely follow, so this provides a nice cross-section of views, including off-the-floor predictions from Enterprise Connect 2015 attendees. That's a lot of free advice, and the price you pay is viewing some promotion at the end showing case studies of how Mitel customers are solving problems using all the wonderful technology we've been crystal balling about.

Fair enough, but overall, it's a good read, and of course, a great way for analysts like me to share our views on where technology is going. You can download the e-book here, and if you want to chat further, drop me a line any time.

Understanding Adoption Barriers to Collaboration, Part 1

This is the third post in my Collaboration Insights series, and since effective collaboration eludes so many companies, I wanted to examine the barriers to adoption. Despite the widespread availability of so many applications that enable collaboration, the results often fall short. While it’s easy to blame this on the technology being complex and/or costly, or limitations on the network/IT side, there are other factors at play. One such factor is tying collaboration to business outcomes, something you might not have considered.
Generally speaking, the easier something is to use, the more often people will use it. The same is also true when the benefit is clearly understood. Think about the telephone – everyone knows how to use it, and the benefits are clear. The same can be said for most communications applications, such as email, messaging, many forms of conferencing and even fax. They’re all easy to use, and each has a distinct benefit – or use case – that drives their usage.
With today’s technologies, there’s no reason why collaboration can’t be the same. Vendors understand the importance of making these platforms easy to use, although some do it better than others. The bigger challenge, however, lies in the benefit, as collaboration results are hard to measure. After all, collaboration is the collective result of using various communications applications in an integrated fashion.
Bigger than the sum of its parts
You can’t conclude that a collaboration session was a success because the call quality on the voice connection was great, or the presence engine made it easy to pull the team together, or the conferencing features made it easy for everyone to join a meeting despite using different endpoints and networks. All of these play a role, but you can’t equate success with any one in particular.
In this regard, collaboration is bigger than the sum of its parts, and that creates specific barriers to adoption. As noted in my last post, the point applications that comprise a collaboration platform each have their own standalone worlds within an enterprise. Telephony is managed by one team, fax by another, video conferencing elsewhere, mobility somewhere else, etc. Each is in a silo, with distinct performance metrics and budgets managed independent of the other communications applications.
Each point application is owned, so to speak, by a team with a budget, and that budget is based on hitting specific metrics. This is very much a legacy model that keeps silos in place, but has no real strategic value to the business. The value is very high tactically, and that’s actually an adoption barrier for today’s collaboration solutions.
Collaboration is strategic, end of story
When you think of collaboration this way, it’s easy to understand why adoption is challenging. Collaboration isn’t tangible like the point applications that comprise a solution, and as such, nobody really “owns” it. The IT group may own the collaboration platform that they acquire from a vendor, but the results that come from collaboration are all driven by end users. Since end users don’t have an economic stake in that platform, they don’t have much incentive to use it, which creates a barrier to adoption.
This is where business outcomes come into play, providing a path for IT to tie these loose ends together. The first step is to start thinking of collaboration as being strategic. Point applications are tactical, and don’t play well together inside the enterprise, which runs counter to the collaboration concept. Strategic resources need to be evaluated differently, using benchmarks that are strategic, not tactical.
The next step is to demonstrate how collaboration can drive business outcomes that have strategic value to the business. Strategic benchmarks can be based on P&L-style metrics, but when management is focused on creating strategic value for the business, other things will carry more weight, such as:
·         Faster time to market for new products/services
·         Better quality products that last longer, perform better, don’t break down, etc.
·         Easier to do business with – both for customers and partners
·         Improved customer satisfaction by providing great experiences and personalized service
·         Happier employees by supporting their preferred work style – better morale, performance and retention
·         Driving innovation to improve processes, workflows, product quality, customer experiences, etc.
·         Inspiring invention to create breakthroughs for competitive differentiation
This is what you need to do to make collaboration strategic, but there’s more to the story. When it comes to breaking down adoption barriers, you also need to think differently. Old habits are hard to break, and that will only happen when you can show there’s a better way with today’s technologies. You’ll need a vision, and that’s where I’ll extend this topic in my next post in this series.

For clarity, please note that this Collaboration Insights series is sponsored by Cisco Canada, but the content is my own, and by design is vendor-neutral.

Next stop, London, ON - speaking on UC

Just a quick update post - am driving to London, Ontario shortly for a one-day seminar focused on Unified Communications. Industry colleague Emily Nielsen is behind this - her firm, Nielesen IT Consulting is running this in partnership with MISA Ontario and Middlesex County. The event is small - I'm told the room is at capacity - but will have a strong regional flavor. It's mostly for the public sector, and that vertical is ripe for what UC can offer.

Emily and I are co-presenting tomorrow morning about the reasons to move ahead with UC, along with a reality check covering the challenges. Despite living in Toronto, I don't get in front of Canadian audiences all that often, so am looking forward to hearing what's really on their minds. Plus, London is home to Western University, my undergrad alma mater, and if time allows, I'd love to visit the campus - it's been a while!

March Writing Roundup

Maybe my busiest month ever in terms of the amount and variety of writing that's out there for public consumption. More of the same coming in April, so plenty of research and writing work to keep me busy. So, here's a digest of the best examples I think you'll enjoy if you didn't catch them first time around.

Collaboration Insights - Getting Work Done, my blog, March 2 - also posted on Cisco Canada's Blog

Will UC Become a Loss Leader?, UCStrategies, March 3

BYOE and the Rise of End-User Driven UC, Internet Telephony Magazine, March 4

Three Ways SIP Phones Add Value Value to Hosted VoIP, Internet Telephony Magazine, March 4

BYOD Expectations - Will Employees be Happier?, Toolbox.com, March 6

More BYOD Expectations - Personal Privacy, Toolbox.com, March 12

Complexity Versus Simplicity in Making Collaboration Work, my blog, March 16 - also posted on Cisco Canada's Blog

BYOD Challenges and Risks - Shadow IT, Toolbox.com, March 17

Verizon's Virtual Communications Express - Bigger can be Beautiful too, my blog, March 18

Energy Thought Summit, Austin - Recap of my Posts, my blog, March 20

TIA's Network of the Future Conference, my blog, March 27

ETS15 Takeaway: Finding Tomorrow's Leaders in the Energy Economy, ETS Insights, March 30

UC Trends and Smart Grid Opportunities - Parallels to Learn From, UCStrategies, March 30

UC Trends and Smart Grid Opportunities - Lessons for Both

I'm a bit of an odd fish, as I swim in two ponds that sometimes blend into one another. Communications tech is my main focus, but you may know that smart grid is another space I'm close to. I've given the backstory on that a few times lately, so if you still need that, just search a bit on my blog, or drop me a note.

Anyhow, last week, I wore my smart grid hat, and was involved with the Energy Thought Summit in Austin, TX. The details are in the post I'm about to steer you to, so I'll just move on. While many of the themes have direct implications for the energy economy, I sure saw a lot of parallels - and learning opportunities - for the UC space. A key reason why I'm active in smart grid is because the transformation challenges that utilities are now facing are very similar to what telcos have been going through ever since VoIP came along.

Not only do I see parallels, but also learning opportunities. It's clear to me that one way UC vendors can have success is by offering a deep set of applications for a specific vertical market. Smart grid - and the broader energy space - is a distinct market, and you won't succeed there unless you understand the opportunity.

If that piques your ineterest, then I think you'll enjoy my current contribution to the UCStrategies portal. It's running now, and while you're there, I welcome you to check my previous posts, as well as the rich content there from my fellow UC Experts.

To carry this a step further in the smart grid vein, watch for my next post here for another article of mine that's running now on the ETS portal.

Next Webinar - Hosted VoIP for SMBs

Got another Ziff Davis webinar coming up in a few weeks. This time around, the topic will be hosted VoIP for SMBs - "why the time is now". If you're an SMB, you don't have to look far these days to find options for adopting VoIP, but to get full value, you need to think things through. VoIP is an easy decision to justify, but it's important to have realistic expectations, especially when going with a hosted provider.

That's the ground I'll be covering during the webinar, and if this is for you, then please join us on April 21 at 2pm ET. All the details you need are here, including the registration form.

TIA’s Network of the Future Conference

I get to my share of industry events, and for a change am posting about one I’m not actually attending. I’ve been sharing ideas recently with TIA, and for their upcoming annual conference, I had an opportunity to moderate. This is an event I’d like to support, but cannot get to due to a schedule conflict. I’ve had a few of these conflicts this year, but that’s out of my control, and you just have to make choices and move on.
So, the next best thing is to say a few things about their event – what I’ll be missing, but what you might catch if you end up attending. Their Network of the Future Conference runs in Dallas from June 2-4, and the lineup is quite strong. Maybe a bit dry for my tastes, as there’s a strong focus on policy and regulation, but that comes with the territory from being in a semi-regulated industry. With that said, here’s an overview of what the conference will be covering.
To address the Network of the Future theme, the conference has three main tracks. First is Future of Wireless, which is self-explanatory. LTE and WiFi will be on the agenda, but so will 5G, so there will be a lot of focus on what’s coming as carriers move to all-IP networks. This will include NFV, small cells and IoT, along with an application-centric approach for developing new services.
The second track is Leveraging the Network, and is focused on new revenues and services. This is where they’ll be examining UC and collaboration, and is the track I would have been involved in if I was able to attend. In addition, they’ll be looking at opportunities in vertical markets like healthcare and retail, and what they call the Industrial Internet of Things. IoT is clearly a big theme across this event - another indication that mobile carriers see their future being about data and not voice.
Finally, the third track is titled Digital Foundations, and backs things up to core network needs instead of the more glamorous world of high-touch applications. To support those applications, this track is about infrastructure issues - Big Data, virtualization, edge computing, data centers, etc.
Beyond those tracks, they have a half day dedicated to policy, and the highlight will be hearing what both Verizon and AT&T have to say about Net Neutrality, probably the biggest issue facing U.S. carriers today. They certainly have a vested interest to protect, and it sure will be interesting to see how they map out and defend their position. Complementing that will be an interview with FCC Commissioner Mignon Clyburn, so Thursday should be a pretty interesting morning.
Also of note – at least for me – will be a couple of sessions around food. First is a cybersecurity breakfast, with speakers from Intel Security and Brink’s. Sure will be interesting to hear these two views – one from the virtual world and one from the physical world – but the threats are just as real for both. Second is a luncheon focused on IoT, and it will great to hear how carriers are thinking about this. No speakers have been announced, but the session includes an M2M showcase, featuring demos from vendors supporting the oneM2M standard.
Finally, the conference is hosting a startup competition. They’re looking for entrants from the ICT space, with an emphasis on things like cybersecurity, data centers, IoT and cloud computing. If you think this could be a good forum for your company, there is still time, as entries close on April 30.
That’s what I’ll be missing, but that shouldn’t get in the way of you attending. For more detail on all these highlights and more, I’ll leave it to you to check out the website and make up your own mind.

Verizon’s Virtual Communications Express – Big can be Beautiful too

I do my share of briefings with both vendors and service providers, and sometimes there’s a good storyline my followers may not be expecting to hear. My recent briefing with Verizon is one such case, as their VirtualCommunications Express – VCE – is showing how big carriers can compete in the SMB space when it comes to hosted VoIP.
Verizon is hardly alone among Tier 1 incumbents in feeling alienated by SMBs, as they historically have been low priority customers, often bound to their carrier by long-term contracts. This is not a recipe for success when real competition emerges, and many SMBs have happily jumped over to cablecos, CLECs and even OTTs. With the rise of VoIP, and more recently cloud-based variations, this giant market space has opened up big-time, putting all incumbents on the defensive.
While the SMB market is a huge Greenfield opportunity for competitors, this is very much now a protect-the-base scenario for incumbents. There’s a lot of business in play, and the likes of Verizon have to decide whether the SMB market is worth fighting for; and if so, they need a better game plan.
My briefing with Verizon- joined by Polycom folks as well – tells me that do have a better game plan now, and that’s what this post is about. As with any hosted VoIP offering, there are two pieces to consider – the product being sold, and the company behind the product - and I got a good sense of both in the lead-up to this post.
The product
VCE is Verizon’s hosted offering, and it’s more of a rich VoIP service than a UC platform, but that’s fine for what most SMBs need. Their point of reference is generally still TDM replacement, so the value proposition needs to be pretty telephony-centric. It has all the features you’d expect when migrating to VoIP, and they do a good job articulating the business value. The benchmark is TDM, so the flexibility of VoIP plays well with SMBs, along with the enhanced features they may not be expecting.
Good examples include auto attendant, multi-party calling – six way (they don’t call it conferencing, but that’s another topic), soft phone support, inter-office extension dialing, self-configured on-hold messaging, simultaneous ring, mobile integration (Apple and Android), and visual voicemail. Any and all of these are a step up from TDM, and Verizon seems to be hitting the right notes with what’s important for SMBs.
Being hosted strikes another chord, and they do a good job stressing the value of business continuity. I don’t think any SMB would question Verizon’s ability to do this, and on this count, their scale does give them a leg up on smaller competitors. On that note, they can comfortably cite the scale of their network and ability to provide carrier-class quality as built-in advantages that come with being an incumbent. The same can also be said for their technical support resources, allowing SMBs to get the same caliber of service as enterprise customers that Verizon caters so well to.
Stepping back – and bringing Polycom into the picture – VCE is being marketed as a communications solution, bringing together the quality of Verizon’s network, the richness of hosted VoIP, and the state of the art suite of IP phones from Polycom. In addition to a variety of SMB-friendly models in their VVX series – all of which support HD – they also offer two models of their SoundStation conferencing phones. Taken together, then, this is not a one-size-fits-all point solution, giving SMBs – and channel partners – a nice set of options to choose from.
Overall, by being hosted, VCE is pitched as a simple solution that’s easy to deploy, scale and use. This really is table stakes, so there’s nothing new there for the SMB market. The twist that I think will really appeal to SMBs is that no contract is required. This may be the norm for OTT VoIP services, but not from a Tier 1 carrier that can truly provide end-to-end QoS.
SMBs are conditioned to expect incumbents to require long, locked-in commitments, but VCE is a welcome about-face. To get carrier-grade quality and great phones without lock-in should be a no-brainer for a lot of SMBs, especially when considering the TCO advantages of hosted VoIP. Long-term, TCO claims may be dubious for cloud services, but SMBs aren’t thinking five years out when it comes to VoIP.
The company – and a happy customer
For the most part, VoIP is VoIP, and all hosted providers can offer something comparable to VCE. So, what would make an SMB stick with Verizon, or switch from someone else? While CLECs face the fundamental challenge of getting SMBs to know about them and trust them, everybody knows who Verizon is. However, most people associate the company with enterprise customers or mobile services. Fair enough, but they are also the incumbent telco for many SMBs, and that’s the market they are trying to serve with VCE. In that regard, there’s a big branding challenge in play here, as they need SMBs to view Verizon as being the right partner when it comes to telephony and communications services.
I’m not saying that Verizon has been totally successful, but they clearly have learned how to support SMBs, and that’s a story worth telling. To do that, I got a first-hand account by interviewing a VCE customer, NYC-based 163rd Street Improvement Council. This is a social services agency in the South Bronx, and truly is a great example of big meeting small with great results all around.
I spoke with Executive Director Cassandra Perry, and in many ways, her Council was a typical SMB Verizon customer. They were locked into a long-term contract, not getting much support, and were overpaying for services they didn’t need. On a more practical level, their telephony system was totally centralized, so if HO had a problem, none of the satellite offices had service either.
Their situation was a bit different, as their operations were largely wiped out by a fire, so they had to start fresh. Fortunately, this happened at a time when Verizon has become more customer-centric, and the results have been excellent. The turnaround started with their Verizon rep really listening to their needs, and from there it was clear that VCE was the right solution. The cloud-based offering keeps their costs down, ensures business continuity, and allows those satellite offices to stay in service regardless of what happens at HO.
More importantly was the sense that Cassandra’s needs were being heard. This was a big change from the historical relationship, and really took down the barrier between a small customer trying to get attention, and the impersonal nature of a big operator. Once those needs were addressed, there was also the peace of mind that comes from the reliability of a Tier 1 network, along with Verizon’s ability to troubleshoot their network and ensure service uptime.
This is key, as Cassandra noted they don’t have an IT department, and it was great to know that Verizon was even able to detect network problems before they hit her LAN. They weren’t getting this level of responsiveness before, and it’s a big reason why they’re happy with Verizon today.
Hope for incumbents and hope for SMBs
You don’t often come across a level playing field like this, and it’s great to see how an incumbent can align so well with an SMB customer. If incumbents like Verizon want to protect that customer base, they have to do business differently, and Cassandra’s story is a textbook example. It starts with listening to customers and developing an offering that speaks to their needs. VCE certainly seems built along those lines, and the rest really comes down to the relationships and ease of doing business.
When those are looked after, Verizon will keep its share of customers. Otherwise, when you hold customers to long-term contracts, sell them more than they need, not be responsive to service requests, limit their options for features and endpoints, etc., that’s when you live up to the bad reputation of an incumbent. Of course, if you really don’t care about SMBs, that’s an easy hand to play, but incumbents now know that SMBs are good business, and to hold off the competition, they need to do more of what Verizon is doing with VCE.

Note - this post has been sponsored by Verizon, but in-kind only. The content is solely mine, and no remuneration of any kind has been provided for this post.

Complexity versus Simplicity in Making Collaboration Work

This is the second post in my new Collaboration Insights series, with the focus being how IT needs to balance the forces of simplicity and complexity in order to get things right with collaboration. My opening post set the stage by looking at the value of collaboration for “getting work done”, which is what employees really care the most about. They don’t care about the technology that drives UC, and that brings us to the natural tension between these two forces.
The challenge of complexity

Collaboration solutions are complex for a variety of reasons, and this creates challenges for both IT and end users. Whether called UC, collaboration or UCC, these platforms can be complex to deploy, and this will be a key consideration when choosing a collaboration vendor, especially those that do not have all the applications native to their solution. Many vendors only have some core pieces of their own, with other elements such as video or conferencing being bolted on from other vendors.
Aside from the high possibility of having a collaboration solution with a multi-vendor makeup, you have the additional challenge of integrating this with your network environment. In principal, having all the applications that drive collaboration under one roof is attractive, but these integration issues are real, and is a key reason why some enterprises are hesitant about deploying a collaboration solution. Vendors may promise a smooth deployment, but when problems arise, it’s easy to understand why enthusiasm for these offerings wanes.
There’s actually an even bigger challenge for enterprises that eschew partnering with a collaboration vendor, and instead choose to drive collaboration with their existing framework. Clearly, some enterprises do elect to take their own path, seeing vendor-based offerings as a risk rather than an opportunity – they’re too complex, no clear ROI, fuzzy business case, etc.
This actually creates greater complexity, since core collaboration applications managed internally are usually based in silos, spread across the organization. Whether it’s telephony, conferencing, video or even fax, each application tends to be managed as a point solution with dedicated resources, performance metrics and budgets.
We all know what’s possible with an integrated collaboration solution, and those results are almost impossible to achieve with this model. Without an overarching framework to integrate these standalone pieces, there is a different kind of complexity that truly limits collaboration in today’s sense of the word.
If that’s not enough, consider the challenges facing end users. Despite all the technical expertise of most IT groups, they struggle with the complexities of collaboration, both in deploying and managing the tools. Of course, their job doesn’t end there, as IT’s success with collaboration ultimately depends on end user adoption. No matter how many problems IT had to solve to seamlessly integrate collaboration applications on the network, their hard work will be for naught if the tools are too complex for end users.
You won’t have adoption problems with super users, but by design, collaboration is for everyone, and that’s how IT has to think in terms of the end result. This doesn’t just extend to the applications themselves – it includes the rules of engagement, usage policies, management controls, number of steps needed to use applications, etc. In other words, effective collaboration is about the total user experience being simple, and that’s not easy to deliver across a large organization.
The imperative of simplicity
While the reality may be complexity, the expectation should be simplicity. All of the above challenges are addressed when simplicity becomes the reality. You may not think it’s possible, especially if your organization is entrenched with silos that don’t talk to each other. Technology has a lot to do with that, and your reality may well be one where IT simply has higher priorities and resource constraints to effectively tackle the problems.
This is certainly a common theme in my research, and is a key reason why enterprises have embraced the cloud. While this seems like a panacea for everything, cloud-based collaboration solutions make a lot of sense. First off, they take the complexity off your plate by managing all the applications on a single platform. When considering purpose-built collaboration platforms, this stops being an infrastructure issue with the cloud, and instead becomes a service you consume, often referred to as UCaaS.
Think about what happens in that scenario. When you partner with vendors that have a deep understanding of both collaboration and the cloud, your IT challenges become simpler. In turn, you can focus downstream on the real success driver – end user adoption. Ideally, collaboration tools should be dead simple to use, but even if you need to school employees on just a few basic steps, that’s a far more attractive scenario that dealing them a complex hand from the start and expecting them to catch on.
Resolving the tension
So, how can IT find a middle ground to address the inherent complexity around collaboration, along with delivering the simplicity required to make it easy for employees, not to mention managing it internally? The long answer requires more in-depth posts, and for now, my message is to start at the beginning. This means recognizing the nature of this complexity and not being resigned to accept it.
Of course, this also depends on your vision for collaboration. If you’re only concerned with maintaining the status quo, complexity won’t get in the way of doing what you’ve always done. However, employees expect more now, and their jobs demand that they have better tools to be productive. The same holds for your customers, so there’s a lot at stake here. Hopefully, this is closer to your reality, and in that case, your vision needs to be about transforming how we work instead of staying the course.
The only way you’re going to get there is by tackling complexity head-on rather than letting it get in the way of collaboration. At the heart of this, you need to find ways to break down silos and leverage the cloud, and if those aren’t top-of-mind yet for your collaboration vision, I hope they are now.
For clarity, please note that this Collaboration Insights series is sponsored by Cisco Canada, but the content is my own, and by design is vendor-neutral.

UC and the Public Sector Seminar, London ON - Join Us!

There aren't many events in the UC space here in Canada, but I will be speaking at one next month. Industry colleague Emily Nielsen is running a one day seminar in London, Ontario. Her practice - Nielsen IT Consulting - is based there, so she knows the local market well. The seminar is being done in partnership with the County of Middlesex and MISA, so there's a very strong focus on the public sector and the value UC can bring to their operations.

This is a one-day event on April 9, and I'll be co-presenting with Emily during a morning session titled "Why Move Forward with UC and What Challenges are Ahead". Well, that's right up my alley, and we've done this sort of thing before, so it should be an informative session.

If London, ON is in your zone for attending - and if the public sector is relevant for you -- and, if UC is on your radar, then this should prove a good use of your time. Details are here on the Nielsen IT website, and now you know what I'll be doing that day.

Three Ways SIP Phones Add Value to Hosted VoIP - New Article

This month I'm getting a double-shot of exposure in TMC publications, and that's fine by me.

Yesterday, I posted about my regular column, Rethinking Communications, and my current article there, which is focused on BYOE and UC. It's getting a lot of readership, and I hope you like it.

Today, I'm blogging about another article of mine, also running in their flagship pub, Internet Telephony Magazine. In this case, the article is part of their Strategic Solutions Series, and based on the title, the focus should be self-explanatory. Whether you call them SIP phones or IP phones, my writeup highlights three ways they can add value to hosted VoIP - rather than just being plain vanilla commodities you buy solely on price.

Not all phones are created equal, and this article is part of a broader engagement I recently completed with VTech to educate the market, so SMBs can make better decisions when moving to hosted VoIP. Overall, I produced three pieces of content, and this article is the final one. The other two were posted on the CIO Review site - one being a different article, and the other being a White Paper, titled "Key Considerations for Buying SIP Phones". Both are easily accessible and all the details are in my recent post here.

BYOE and End User-Driven UC

Followers will know that I write a monthly column for TMC - Rethinking Communications. My articles usually run in their flagship pub, Internet Telephony, but depending on the content, sometimes they'll turn up in their other pubs.

Followers will also know that I recently wrote a white paper for ShoreTel about this topic - BYOE - Bring Your Own Experience, and how it's impacting the UC value proposition. BYOE can be tricky to define, but clearly, consumer-based experiences are driving expectations about how to communicate and collaborate in the workplace. 

To explore that further, I've added some things in my current article. It's running now in their digital edition, and if you give it a read, I'd love to hear your thoughts. Ditto for my white paper if you haven't seen it yet. 

February Writing Roundup

Was hoping to get this posted earlier in the week, but that's a sign of how busy things have been around here. New business continues developing, so I blog as time allows. Quickly, if you like my writing, here are the top posts and articles from me over the last month.

Five Considerations for Buying SIP Phones, Authored article, CIO Review, February 26

Key Considerations for Choosing SIP Phones, new White Paper, sponsored by VTech, February 24

What BYOD Means for SMBs, Toolbox.com, February 19

Yorktel Case Study - the Right Way to Sell Video, JAA blog, February 18

Cisco Canada's New HQ - Hard Hat Tour, JAA blog, February 16

The Cloud is Coming for VoIP - Are You Ready?, Toolbox.com, February 9

Key to Success with Remote Working - Define Your Vision, Toolbox.com, February 3

Will UC Become a Loss Leader?

Good question, huh?I think it will, and in light of this week's surprise move from Mitel to acquire Mavenir, this may not seem so far-fetched. If their move pays off, it might also indicate that UC vendors aren't necessarily selling to the right customers.

It's always good to question the status quo, especially with UC, where nothing is really on firm ground. I hope that's enough to steer you now to my current posting on UCStrategies. As a UC Expert, I contribute regualrly there, and I encourage you to spend more time on the portal - I'm just one of many analysts and consultants following UC, and this is where we speak our minds.

Collaboration Insights – Getting Work Done – New Series

The term collaboration is a bit of a loaded word, but it’s become central to any conversation now around workplace productivity and communications technology. To help decision-makers get better value from collaboration initiatives, this marks the start of a new series based on my ongoing industry research.
For clarity, I will state upfront that this series is sponsored by Cisco Canada, but the content is mine. My analysis is independent and vendor-neutral, so you won’t be reading much here about Cisco’s collaboration offerings or their competitors for that matter.
It’s about getting work done
To set the stage for these posts, I’d like to begin with the fundamental need for “getting work done”. You would think that with all the technology and communications tools at our disposal, businesses would run like well-oiled machines, but the exact opposite is closer to reality. If anything, we have too many tools, and more specifically, they tend to be used in a standalone manner. While this can be effective for one-to-one interactions, team-based scenarios are far more challenging.
Increasingly, employees need to work in teams, and it’s the exception when everyone is in the same physical space at the same time. Since teams also need to function over time, it should be expected that while working on a project together, people will at various times be in different locations. Not to mention that each employee is typically part of multiple teams, with each having their own distribution of members.
These are just a few examples as to why collaboration is a fluid concept, along with why getting work done can be so challenging. Ideally, communications technologies should be transparent, seamlessly enabling people to collaborate under all conditions, but this is harder to do than it looks. However, it doesn’t have to be that way.
To some extent, all organizations have cultural issues that impede effective collaboration, and the same can be said for arcane business processes that cannot benefit from today’s tools to make workflows more efficient. Those are likely beyond your control, so I would advocate focusing inward on things you can control. A good starting point is getting a better understanding of how today’s collaboration technologies can dovetail with how work gets done now.
What does collaboration mean to you?
A lot of this actually has to do with how you think about collaboration. When it comes to getting work done, do you view collaboration as drawing from a set of standalone applications to facilitate communication? Or, do you see it as a dynamic process based on a set of communications applications that are highly integrated, not just with each other, but throughout your network, tied into business applications that drive workflows?
If you are steeped in what Unified Communications has to offer, you’ll know there are solutions out there to support the latter. However, even these offerings can come up short, simply because the expectations of employees are being driven more by their consumer experiences than what’s available in the office. The “consumerization of IT” trend is real, and the pace of innovation is simply faster and more accessible on the home front. UC offerings tend to lag here, making them followers rather than leaders, and this is where the getting work done challenge is magnified.
When employees come to the office with consumer-based expectations for getting work done, the challenges become clear. They get frustrated because IT either cannot or will not support the applications they use so comfortably in their personal lives. Some will find workarounds to use those tools outside the realm of IT, but most end up taking a step back and making do with what’s available.
Think about how many phone calls end up in voicemail. Think about how often employees don’t even bother to listen to VM. Think about how much time is wasted with tedious close-the-loop and CYA emails. Think about how difficult it is for employees to use video, especially with contacts outside the business. Think about hard it is to use collaboration tools across fixed and mobile environments.
No doubt you can add to this list, and it should be clear how real these problems are and the obstacles they present to effective collaboration. If you think of them as isolated issues that can be addressed on an as-needed basis, you’re missing the bigger picture. Employees don’t just need multiple tools and modes to collaborate when working in disparate groups; they also need them to interwork amongst themselves to create an experience that mirrors in-person engagement. Not only that, but to get that experience, they need to interwork across multiple devices, operating systems, and networks.
Rethinking collaboration
This sounds like a tall order, but if you think along these lines, you’ll look at communications technology differently. Unified Communications represents an entry point for what collaboration needs to be today, but these are just tools for IT to provide. You need to drive that with a vision – one that speaks to the outcomes demanded by the business and your customers, along with what collaboration means to employees, especially those from the Internet generation. Whether or not IT is rooted in that generation, this is the way forward, and is where the rethinking needs to happen.
I’ll frame that rethinking as this series continues, especially regarding the complexity associated with collaboration, the challenges posed by a lack of vendor interoperability, and how IT needs to approach getting buy-in for collaboration throughout the organization. There’s a lot of ground to cover, and my intention is for you to see collaboration not just as a set of applications, but as an enabler of business transformation.


New Article - Five Considerations for Buying SIP Phones

Earlier this week, I posted about my new White Paper about what to look for when buying IP/SIP phones for your business. The post also explained the back story for the research, which was sponsored by VTech.

The White Paper is getting a lot of attention, which is good for me, and hopefully good for VTech. As explained earlier, I also wrote two articles complementing the paper, and one of them has recently been published. Titled "Five Considerations for Buying SIP Phones", the article is running now in CIO Review, and explores key buying factors that were touched on in the paper. Here's the link to the article, and if you like it, I hope you share it on social meda. That won't just make me happy, but VTech and the publisher too!

Key Considerations for Choosing SIP Phones - my new White Paper

I've been on a steady run of projects, and the past while, one has been with VTech. You may know them as a leading brand for cordless phones in the consumer space, but they also have a full product line for businesses. They're not as well known as the more established vendors, but feel they have some differentiators to change that. To that end, they engaged me for some thought leadership deliverables.

The main piece is a white paper, and that's what I'm blogging about here. I also produced articles for two different publications; one I'll be blogging about shortly and the other one will run next month. After conducting my research, it was clear to me that VTech has a good story, but more importantly, that businesses are not well informed when it comes to making buying decisions around IP or SIP-based phones.

My deliverables have focused mainly on the latter, and the white paper can be downloaded here from VTech's Business Phones website. The paper has been written primarily for SMBs, and my intention is to provide a foundation for understanding how best to derive value from IP phones, especially when adopting a hosted VoIP service. I hope you find it helpful, and welcome your feedback or comments.